Simple Stuff Blog

Complex ideas made simple, and easier to share.

COPD Telehealth in East Lancashire


Remote monitoring in COPD ; how much & how often ?

  • As a GP associated with the East Lancs COPD Telehealth Project I have been considering what evidence there currently is for the model of Telehealth which is being proposed.

    I was asked to join this project in spring 2012. The choice of providers & type of teleheath technology had already been agreed. The aim was to explore how the technology could be used in East Lancashire COPD patients, and shed some light on how much impact this could have on the patients experience of COPD and what impact it had on the healthcare workload.

    We are planning on using remote monitoring technology to enable remote recording of the patients blood pressure, pulse oximetry and temperature. These readings are taken by the patient ONCE a day and sent to a remote monitoring hub which effectively aims to spot significant changes and decides if the patient needs to have contact with a clinical team member.

    Patients will be selected on the basis of those at high risk of needing a medical admission in the following year using the Blackpool NHS Predictive Risk Tool. This tool is being incorporated into the GP patient record systems of practices which signup to working with the project.

    We are NOT using a video conferencing service like skype , and the patients will NOT be provided with a means of accessing the internet at home.

    The big question is “Does remote monitoring of particular parameters result in a more timely intervention ( antibiotics + / – oral steroids ) , compared to the usual monitoring ?”

    Unfortunately there is quite a variation in what constitutes as usual management of the COPD patient in East Lancs. We already have a “virtual ward” which enables patients to have regular nurse visits , but at home as opposed to on a real hospital ward. The virtual ward also delivers an education package that helps the patient to understand more about COPD, the benefits of stopping smoking, rehab and how to spot signs of deterioration.

    The expert COPD patient their carer is likely to appreciate what the early signs of a clinical deterioration look like. They probably keep a supply of “rescue antibiotics and rescue steroids at home”. Not all patients are highly motivated expert patients who have “signed up” to the benefits of pulmonary rehab and the advantages of taking an active role in managing their COPD ( where appropriate ).

    Remote monitoring could help all patients with COPD to manage their condition more effectively and reduce the risk of admission to hospital.

    There is some discussion about how frequently the technology should prompt the patient to provide a reading.

    What is the ideal frequency of monitoring ? 7 days a week, 5 days a week( Monday to Friday ) , or two days a week ? Opting for the 7 day a week monitoring will result in a higher cost per patient ; this will mean less patients taking part in this project.

    What difference does the remote monitoring make over and above having an informed patient ?

    If there is no evidence in support of any one of these frequencies I wonder if we should be looking at joining forces with another project to try and evaluate what is the most cost effective use of this technology.

    Telehealth & remote monitoring will become more useful and cost effective as the technology develops. It isn’t too hard to imagine a situation in which a patient uses their own mobile telephone to act as the hub that collects and monitors the readings. Many patients already own BP measuring devices.

    Please comment on this post

    4 comments on “COPD Telehealth in East Lancashire

    1. Dean Jenkins
      18/08/2012

      Sounds like a great project and the aim to empower patients a useful one. It is the nurse expertise that is crucial and protecting their time key. Is the money better spent on clinical expertise rather than the technical kit? Probably the human part I’d say.

      What technology are you using? Presume you’re doing peak flow. This would ‘train’ patients to do it regularly. Is that effective? Could they just SMS the results on their cell phone? Cheaper kit. Monitoring inhaler use would be funky. Monitoring steps or excursions from the home via GPS would be a good marker. Would be really interesting to see what technology that the patient already has could be used to monitor disease.

      • simplestuffblog
        18/08/2012

        The remote monitoring in this proposal will only be of BP, pulse oximetry ( finger oxygen level using clip on device ) and temperature.

        Yes all of the above could be reported to a nurse on the end of a telephone line or by SMS – but that would be more labour intensive.( It would also provide other non medical
        advantages Eg reduce social isolation )

        The selling point of the system is the smart logic part which aims to identify genuine alerts from false ones – ie readings that suggest something went wrong with the technique.

        I have asked that we record what the patients previous use of technology was. Eg did they previously have Internet , mobile phone or computer.

        In many respects the most important part is how do doctors , nurses , carers & patients feel about using technology in this way? What can we do to make it more acceptable ?

        Telehealth is far too broad a term. It can mean literally any way of providing healthcare at a distance ( telephone, letter, morse code , message in a bottle)

        We will be considering what use we can make of existing tech in the patients home.

    2. Diane Ridgway
      30/08/2012

      Re: Frequency of monitoring: previous initiatives have used a step up step down approach to frequency of monitoring 3/5/7 days. Compliance / concordance/ family, carer support / OOH co-operation is a good measure to acsertain suitability to step down over the weekend.

      • simplestuffblog
        30/08/2012

        I think we have agreed to opt for 7 days of monitoring with the option of reducing the frequency if no additional benefit from more frequent measurements.

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s

    Information

    This entry was posted on 17/08/2012 by in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , .

    Recent tweets

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

    Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 9,113 other followers

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 9,113 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: